Update 16.6.10 -
According to The New York Times and San Francisco Chronicle, the vote is in – 10 to 1. San Francisco, California is officially the first US city that will require cell phone retailers, by law, to display the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) of mobile phones on sale.
The law was passed yesterday despite conclusive scientific evidence showing the correlation between cell phones and health related issues.
The truth is this issue is about giving consumers information that they have a right to know. The law is not meant to deter cell phone sales but to inform shoppers. We think this is a great initiative because it’s right in line with our philosophy – to help people make informed decisions and responsible phone usage.
We think San Francisco is going to pioneer the way and are closely monitoring other states and nations that will join in on the consumer cell phone information bandwagon.
We’ll keep you posted!
Back to the original post:
The latest mobile news, according to the SF Gate, is that the vote to make San Francisco the first US city that will require retailers to disclose mobile phone radiation levels has been delayed to June 15th. Apparently on this date the board of supervisors will reconsider the matter after reviewing legal implications for small business owners.
Proponents of the vote believe this could be the beginning of a national US trend. Opponents of the vote, including local retailers and cellular phone providers, are strongly opposed
citing inconclusive scientific evidence showing the health risks associated with mobile phones.
This kind of initiative is a big step forward in raising people’s awareness about the issue of mobile phone radiation because only with knowledge can we act more responsibly.
However mobile phone users should be aware that the SAR or Specific Absorption Rate (that, should the vote pass, will be disclosed at point of sale) doesn’t actually reflect the radiation that users are exposed to. SAR reflects the maximum radiation level for each phone model.
What most people don’t know is that SAR levels of mobile phones are dynamic and change constantly (from zero to the max SAR values of the specific phone model) based on varying factors like environment and the way you use your phone. That’s why our patent-pending RRI™ (Real-time Radiation Indication) technology takes into account dynamic SAR values and factors in additional dynamic environmental and usage parameters to provide users with a real-time indication of their exposure to mobile phone radiation and in addition the accumulation of the radiation they’re actually exposed to over time.
We’ll certainly be keeping an eye on developments in San Francisco that may set the precedent in mobile phone radiation transparency throughout the US and perhaps the world, as we’re sure many mobile phone users, industry and retailers will too.
And all that said,
Safe talking…
The tawkon team






I agree with you that it’s an important first step to make sure people know of the potential risks, but it’s not the same as cigarette warnings – the danger can’t really be compared
You’re right – we’ve had decades of hindsight and health studies to pinpoint the health impact of smoking, and while no one can yet determine the exact risks associated with mobile phone radiation, we believe it’s better to be cautious today than sorry tomorrow. These warning labels will simply make people conscious of the potential risks associated with mobile phone radiation so everyone can decide for themselves whether or not to take precautionary measures to reduce their exposure to mobile phone radiation. It’s not about warning or danger, but rather raising awareness.
Hi Noemi
Thanks for your comment. The danger currently can’t be compared because studies aren’t yet conclusive, but once the 10-year studies have been completed, (and UCLA Professor Kheifets is using tawkon in such studies), it may well show measurable damage especially for excessive and accumulative cellphone use. In the meantime, we can all take precautionary measures, or not… but at least we should have the choice to see when we’re exposed and how to lower exposure.
Thanks for your interest…